Skip to content


New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Head - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number234 U.S. 166
AppellantNew York Life Ins. Co.
RespondentHead
Excerpt:
new york life ins. co. v. head - 234 u.s. 166 (1914) u.s. supreme court new york life ins. co. v. head, 234 u.s. 166 (1914) new york life insurance company v. head no. 255 argued march 10, 1914 decided june 8, 1914 234 u.s. 166 error to the supreme court of the state of missouri syllabus decided on authority of the preceding case. 241 mo, 420 reversed. the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. chief justice white delivered the opinion of the court. this case is governed by the opinion in no. 254, just decided. the policy sued on was one of the two issued to richard g. head in kansas city, missouri, in favor of his minor son. it was delivered at kansas city and the first premium paid there, as in the.....
Judgment:
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head - 234 U.S. 166 (1914)
U.S. Supreme Court New York Life Ins. Co. v. Head, 234 U.S. 166 (1914)

New York Life Insurance Company v. Head

No. 255

Argued March 10, 1914

Decided June 8, 1914

234 U.S. 166

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

Syllabus

Decided on authority of the preceding case.

241 Mo, 420 reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is governed by the opinion in No. 254, just decided. The policy sued on was one of the two issued to Richard G. Head in Kansas City, Missouri, in favor of his minor son. It was delivered at Kansas City and the first premium paid there, as in the previous case, and the subsequent premiums were paid in New Mexico. There was borrowed upon the policy by authority of the proper probate court in New Mexico the sum of $2,270, under a loan agreement and pledge; there was a default and an adjustment of the policy as in the other case. The case was tried in the court of first instance with the other case, was embraced in the Supreme Court of Missouri by the

Page 234 U. S. 167

same opinion by which the other case was disposed of, and, there thus being no distinction between the two cases, for reasons given in the other case, No. 254,

The judgment is reversed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //