Skip to content


Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry Co. Vs. Moore - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number233 U.S. 182
AppellantAtchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry Co.
RespondentMoore
Excerpt:
atchison, topeka & santa fe ry co. v. moore - 233 u.s. 182 (1914) u.s. supreme court atchison, topeka & santa fe ry co. v. moore, 233 u.s. 182 (1914) atchison, topeka & santa fe railway company v. moore no. 451 argued february 26, 1914 decided april 6, 1914 233 u.s. 182 error to the supreme court of the state of oklahoma syllabus decided on authority of the preceding case. the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. justice day delivered the opinion of the court. the defendants in error brought suit in the district court of lincoln county, oklahoma, against the plaintiff in error, for damages, alleging that they were the owners of a certain racehorse which had been shipped by page 233 u. s. 183 .....
Judgment:
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. Moore - 233 U.S. 182 (1914)
U.S. Supreme Court Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. Moore, 233 U.S. 182 (1914)

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Moore

No. 451

Argued February 26, 1914

Decided April 6, 1914

233 U.S. 182

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Syllabus

Decided on authority of the preceding case.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendants in error brought suit in the district court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, against the plaintiff in error, for damages, alleging that they were the owners of a certain racehorse which had been shipped by

Page 233 U. S. 183

them over the railroad of the plaintiff in error from Kansas City, Missouri, to Lawrence, Kansas, and which had been injured in transit. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants in error, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma (36 Okl. 433).

It appears that the horse, for the injury to which this suit was brought, was a part of the shipment under which the horse in the previous case of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, just decided, p. 233 U. S. 173 , was carried as therein stated, and that the facts relating to the shipment and cause of injury set forth in the present case are the same as those in the Robinson case. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, after noticing the fact that, except as to the value of the animals, the extent of their injuries and the resulting damages, the two cases were identical in every material feature, followed the Robinson case.

The present case therefore is controlled by the decision in the Robinson case, and, from what we have there said, it follows that the judgment here under review must be reversed.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY dissents.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //