Skip to content


Mutual Film Co. Vs. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number236 U.S. 247
AppellantMutual Film Co.
Respondentindustrial Comm'n of Ohio
Excerpt:
mutual film co. v. industrial comm'n of ohio - 236 u.s. 247 (1915) u.s. supreme court mutual film co. v. industrial comm'n of ohio, 236 u.s. 247 (1915) mutual film company v. industrial commission of ohio no. 457 argued january 6, 7, 1915 decided february 23, 1915 236 u.s. 247 appeal from the district court of the united states for the northern district of ohio syllabus decided on authority of mutual film corp. v. industrial comm'n of ohio, ante, p. 236 u. s. 230 . the facts are stated in the opinion. page 236 u. s. 248 mr. justice mckenna delivered the opinion of the court. this case was submitted with no. 456, just decided. in the latter case the complainant in the court below, and.....
Judgment:
Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio - 236 U.S. 247 (1915)
U.S. Supreme Court Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio, 236 U.S. 247 (1915)

Mutual Film Company v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

No. 457

Argued January 6, 7, 1915

Decided February 23, 1915

236 U.S. 247

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Syllabus

Decided on authority of Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio, ante, p. 236 U. S. 230 .

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 236 U. S. 248

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case was submitted with No. 456, just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below, and appellant here, was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant in the pending case is a corporation of Ohio, and counsel say,

"although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the question involved are the same the records in both cases are nearly identical, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both."

And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.

On the authority, therefore, of the opinion in No. 456, the decree is

Affirmed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //