Skip to content


Purcell Vs. Quaker Realty Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number239 U.S. 635
AppellantPurcell
RespondentQuaker Realty Co.
Excerpt:
purcell v. quaker realty co. - 239 u.s. 635 (1916) u.s. supreme court purcell v. quaker realty co., 239 u.s. 635 (1916) 70 s. ct. 283 239 u.s. 635 60 l. ed. 479 robert m. purcell et al., plaintiffs in error, v. quaker realty company, limited. no. 152. supreme court of the united states january 10, 1916 mr. e. howard mccaleb for plaintiffs in error. mr. william winans wall for defendants in error. per curiam: dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) castillo v. mcconnico, 168 u.s. 674 , 42 l. ed. 622, 18 sup. ct. rep. 229; de bearn v. safe deposit & t. co. 233 u.s. 24, 34 , 58 s. l. ed. 833, 837, 34 sup. ct. rep. 584; mcdonald v. oregon r. & nav. co. 233 u.s. 665, 669 , 670 s., 58 l. ed......
Judgment:
PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO. - 239 U.S. 635 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)

70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479

ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674 , 42 L. ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34 , 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669 , 670 S., 58 L. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161 , 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624 , 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45 , 59 L. ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 , 59 L. ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //