Skip to content


Coon Rapids Nat Bank Vs. Lee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number239 U.S. 659
AppellantCoon Rapids Nat Bank
RespondentLee
Excerpt:
coon rapids nat bank v. lee - 239 u.s. 659 (1916) u.s. supreme court coon rapids nat bank v. lee, 239 u.s. 659 (1916) 239 u.s. 659 coon rapids national bank et al., plaintiffs in error, v. maggie i. lee,1 executrix, etc. no. 796. supreme court of the united states january 10, 1916 no appearance for plaintiffs in error. mr. a. b. cummins and mr. o. m. brockett for defendant in error. docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the ninth rule. footnotes footnote 1 death of anderville lee suggested, and appearance of maggie i. lee, as party in error herein, filed and entered on january 10, 1916.
Judgment:
COON RAPIDS NAT BANK v. LEE - 239 U.S. 659 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court COON RAPIDS NAT BANK v. LEE, 239 U.S. 659 (1916)

239 U.S. 659

COON RAPIDS NATIONAL BANK et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MAGGIE I. LEE,1 Executrix, etc.
No. 796.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

No appearance for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. A. B. Cummins and Mr. O. M. Brockett for defendant in error.

Docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Ninth Rule.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 Death of Anderville Lee suggested, and appearance of Maggie I. Lee, as party in error herein, filed and entered on January 10, 1916.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //