Skip to content


Lincoln Vs. Power - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number241 U.S. 651
AppellantLincoln
RespondentPower
Excerpt:
.....lincoln, appellant, v. james m. power, marshal, etc. no. 793. supreme court of the united states may 1, 1916 per curiam: judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) re oteiza y cortes, 136 u.s. 330, 334 , 34 s. l. ed. 464, 466, 10 sup. ct. rep. 1031, 8 am. crim. rep. 241; ornelas v. ruiz, 161 u.s. 502, 508 , 40 s. l. ed. 787, 789, 16 sup. ct. rep. 689; page 241 u.s. 651, 652 bryant v. united states, 167 u.s. 104, 105 , 42 s. l. ed. 94, 95, 17 sup. ct. rep. 744; terlinden v. ames, 184 u.s. 270, 278 , 46 s. l. ed. 534, 541, 22 sup. ct. rep. 484, 12 am. crim. rep. 424; elias v. ramirez, 215 u.s. 398, 406 , 407 s., 54 l. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 sup. ct. rep. 131; mcnamara v. henkel, 226 u.s. 520, 523 , 57 s......
Judgment:
LINCOLN v. POWER - 241 U.S. 651 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court LINCOLN v. POWER , 241 U.S. 651 (1916)

241 U.S. 651

IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, Marshal, etc.
No. 793.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 1, 1916

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330, 334 , 34 S. L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502, 508 , 40 S. L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689;

Page 241 U.S. 651, 652

Bryant v. United States, 167 U.S. 104, 105 , 42 S. L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U.S. 270, 278 , 46 S. L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398, 406 , 407 S., 54 L. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U.S. 520, 523 , 57 S. L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610 , 54 L. ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U.S. 580 , 59 L. ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31 , 60 L. ed . --, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.

Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.

Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //