Skip to content


Sears Vs. Inhabitants of Town of Nahant - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number248 U.S. 543
AppellantSears
Respondentinhabitants of Town of Nahant
Excerpt:
sears v. inhabitants of town of nahant - 248 u.s. 543 (1918) u.s. supreme court sears v. inhabitants of town of nahant , 248 u.s. 543 (1918) 248 u.s. 543 frederick r. sears et al., plaintiffs in error, v. inhabitants of the town of nahant, etc. no. 61. supreme court of the united states december 23, 1918 mr. burton e. eames, of boston, mass., for plaintiffs in error. messrs. robert g. dodge and arthur d. hill, both of boston, mass., for defendants in error. per curiam. dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) mccain v. des moines, 174 u.s. 168, 181 , 19 s. sup. ct. 644; western union tel. co. v. ann arbor r. r. co., 178 u.s. 239, 243 , 20 s. sup. ct. 867; hull v. burr, 234 u.s. 712, 720 ,.....
Judgment:
SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT - 248 U.S. 543 (1918)
U.S. Supreme Court SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT , 248 U.S. 543 (1918)

248 U.S. 543

Frederick R. SEARS et al., plaintiffs in error,
v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 23, 1918

Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181 , 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243 , 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720 , 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147 , 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100 , 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232 , 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79 , 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216 , 35 Sup. Ct. 285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599 , 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304 , 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257 , 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //