Skip to content


Gettys Vs. Newburger - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number260 U.S. 693
AppellantGettys
RespondentNewburger
Excerpt:
.....24 sup. ct. 174. footnote 2 32 sup. ct. 704.[ gettys v. newburger 260 u.s. 693 (1922) ] .....
Judgment:
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER - 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
U.S. Supreme Court GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)

260 U.S. 693

Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1922

Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526 , 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561 , 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720 , 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147 , 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97. Footnotes

Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.

Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //