Skip to content

Mellon Vs. Gray - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number274 U.S. 715
.....of glen e. gray. supreme court of the united states april 25, 1927 messrs. shurtleff, oakes & hinkley, of lancaster, n. h., and charles h. blatchford, of portland, me., for petitioner. messrs. hollis r. bailey, of boston, mass., and murchie & murchie, of concord, n. h. (messrs. alexander murchie and robert c. murchie, both of concord, n. h., of counsel), for respondent. per curiam. reversed on the authority of reading company v. john l. koons, administrator, 271 u.s. 58 , 46 s. ct. 405.[ mellon v. gray 274 u.s. 715 (1927) ]
MELLON v. GRAY - 274 U.S. 715 (1927)
U.S. Supreme Court MELLON v. GRAY, 274 U.S. 715 (1927)

274 U.S. 715
No. 280.

Andrew W. MELLON, as Director General of Railroads, petitioner,
Leah M. GRAY, Administratrix of the ESTATE OF Glen E. GRAY.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 25, 1927

Messrs. Shurtleff, Oakes & Hinkley, of Lancaster, N. H., and Charles H. Blatchford, of Portland, Me., for petitioner.

Messrs. Hollis R. Bailey, of Boston, Mass., and Murchie & Murchie, of Concord, N. H. (Messrs. Alexander Murchie and Robert C. Murchie, both of Concord, N. H., of counsel), for respondent.


Reversed on the authority of Reading Company v. John L. Koons, Administrator, 271 U.S. 58 , 46 S. Ct. 405.[ Mellon v. Gray 274 U.S. 715 (1927) ]

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //