Skip to content


Eastern Transp Co, Ex Parte - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number283 U.S. 790
AppellantEastern Transp Co, Ex Parte
Excerpt:
eastern transp co, ex parte - 283 u.s. 790 (1931) u.s. supreme court eastern transp co, ex parte, 283 u.s. 790 (1931) 283 u.s. 790 ex parte eastern transportation company et al., petitioners. no. ___, original. supreme court of the united states march 23, 1931 messrs. edward r. baird, jr., of norfolk, va., charles r. hickox, of new york city, and george m. lanning, of norfolk, va., for petitioners. the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.
Judgment:
EASTERN TRANSP CO, EX PARTE - 283 U.S. 790 (1931)
U.S. Supreme Court EASTERN TRANSP CO, EX PARTE, 283 U.S. 790 (1931)

283 U.S. 790

Ex parte EASTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY et al., petitioners.

No. ___, original.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 23, 1931

Messrs. Edward R. Baird, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., Charles R. Hickox, of New York City, and George M. Lanning, of Norfolk, Va., for petitioners.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //