Skip to content


Borum Vs. U S - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number284 U.S. 596
AppellantBorum
RespondentU S
Excerpt:
.....c. (messrs. leo a. rover, u. s. atty., and william h. collins, asst. u. s. atty., both of washington, d. c., of counsel), for the united states. per curiam. question answered 'yes.' dunn v. united states (no. 393) 284 u.s. 390 , 52 s. ct. 189, october term, 1931, decided january 11, 1932. mandate to issue forthwith. .....
Judgment:
BORUM v. U S - 284 U.S. 596 (1932)
U.S. Supreme Court BORUM v. U S, 284 U.S. 596 (1932)

284 U.S. 596

BORUM et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 550.

Decided Jan. 25, 1932.

Mr. James A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. John H. Burnett, Alfred Goldstine, and Bertrand Emerson, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Borum and others.

The Attorney General, Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William H. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Question answered 'Yes.' Dunn v. United States (No. 393) 284 U.S. 390 , 52 S. Ct. 189, October term, 1931, decided January 11, 1932. Mandate to issue forthwith.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //