Skip to content


Columbia-deschutes Power Co. Vs. Stricklin - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number290 U.S. 590
AppellantColumbia-deschutes Power Co.
RespondentStricklin
Excerpt:
columbia-deschutes power co. v. stricklin - 290 u.s. 590 (1933) u.s. supreme court columbia-deschutes power co. v. stricklin, 290 u.s. 590 (1933) 290 u.s. 590 columbia-deschutes power company, appellant, v. charles e. stricklin, as state engineer of the state of oregon. no. 3. supreme court of the united states october 16, 1933 mr. arthur l. veazie, of portland, or., for appellant. messrs. i. h. van winkle and willis s. moore, both of salem, or., for appellee. for opinions below, see 134 or. 623, 286 p. 563, 294 p. 1049. per curiam. the appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the application for allowance of the appeal was not made within the time provided by law. section 8(a), act of.....
Judgment:
COLUMBIA-DESCHUTES POWER CO. v. STRICKLIN - 290 U.S. 590 (1933)
U.S. Supreme Court COLUMBIA-DESCHUTES POWER CO. v. STRICKLIN, 290 U.S. 590 (1933)

290 U.S. 590

COLUMBIA-DESCHUTES POWER COMPANY, appellant,
v.
Charles E. STRICKLIN, as State Engineer of the State of Oregon.

No. 3.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 16, 1933

Mr. Arthur L. Veazie, of Portland, Or., for appellant.

Messrs. I. H. Van Winkle and Willis S. Moore, both of Salem, Or., for appellee.

For opinions below, see 134 Or. 623, 286 P. 563, 294 P. 1049.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the application for allowance of the appeal was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8(a), Act of February 13, 1925 ( chapter 229, 43 Stat. 936, 940, U. S. Code, title 28, 350 [28 USCA 350 ]).


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //