Skip to content


Ross Vs. Fort - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number290 U.S. 603
AppellantRoss
RespondentFort
Excerpt:
ross v. fort - 290 u.s. 603 (1933) u.s. supreme court ross v. fort, 290 u.s. 603 (1933) 290 u.s. 603 lida m. ross, appellant, v. dancey fort, commissioner of finance and taxation of the state of tennessee. no. 613. supreme court of the united states december 18, 1933 appeal from the supreme court of the state of tennessee. mr. j. a. fowler, of knoxville, tenn., for appellant. for opinion below, see 61 s.w.(2d) 479. per curiam. the appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) maguire v. trefry, 253 u.s. 12 , 40 s. ct. 417; (2) klein v. board of supervisors, 282 u.s. 19 , 22-24, 51 s. ct. 15, 73 a. l. r. 679; magoun v. illinois trust & savings bank, 170 u.s. 283, 298 , 299.....
Judgment:
ROSS v. FORT - 290 U.S. 603 (1933)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSS v. FORT, 290 U.S. 603 (1933)

290 U.S. 603

Lida M. ROSS, appellant,
v.
Dancey FORT, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of the State of Tennessee.
No. 613.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 18, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12 , 40 S. Ct. 417; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19 , 22-24, 51 S. Ct. 15, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298 , 299 S., 18 S. Ct. 594; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535 , 536 S., 32 S. Ct. 105; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550 , 32 S. Ct. 784.[ Ross v. Fort 290 U.S. 603 (1933) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //