Skip to content


Washburn Crosby Co. Vs. Nee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number296 U.S. 641
AppellantWashburn Crosby Co.
RespondentNee
Excerpt:
washburn crosby co. v. nee - 296 u.s. 641 (1935) u.s. supreme court washburn crosby co. v. nee, 296 u.s. 641 (1935) 296 u.s. 641 washburn crosby company, petitioner, v. dan m. lee, individually and as collector, etc.* no. 514. supreme court of the united states november 11, 1935 mr. charles b. rugg, of boston, mass., for petitioner. the attorney general, for respondent. no opinion filed in court below. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit denied. * rehearing denied 296 u.s. 664, 56 s. ct. 307.[ washburn crosby co v. nee 296 u.s. 641 (1935) ]
Judgment:
WASHBURN CROSBY CO. v. NEE - 296 U.S. 641 (1935)
U.S. Supreme Court WASHBURN CROSBY CO. v. NEE, 296 U.S. 641 (1935)

296 U.S. 641

WASHBURN CROSBY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
Dan M. LEE, Individually and as Collector, etc.*
No. 514.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 11, 1935

Mr. Charles B. Rugg, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, for respondent.

No opinion filed in court below.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 664, 56 S. Ct. 307.[ Washburn Crosby Co v. Nee 296 U.S. 641 (1935) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //