Skip to content


Carlson Vs. Kesler - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number302 U.S. 639
AppellantCarlson
RespondentKesler
Excerpt:
.....administrator of the estate of william e, koch, deceased, appellant, v. lloyd kesler, harry kesler, also known as harry e. kesler, partners, etc., et al. no. 373. supreme court of the united states october 11, 1937 mr. howard f. bishop, of chicago, ill., for appellant. for opinions below, see 198 n.e. 451; 199 n.e. 889. per curiam. the motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. section 237(a), judicial code, as amended by the act of february 13, 1925, 43 stat. 936, 937 (28 u. s.c.a. 344(a). treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c), judicial code, as amended, 43 stat. 936, 938 (28 u.s.c.a. 344(c),.....
Judgment:
CARLSON v. KESLER - 302 U.S. 639 (1937)
U.S. Supreme Court CARLSON v. KESLER, 302 U.S. 639 (1937)

302 U.S. 639

Lawrence E. CARLSON, Administrator of the Estate of William E, Koch, deceased, appellant,
v.
Lloyd KESLER, Harry Kesler, Also known as Harry E. Kesler, Partners, etc., et al.
No. 373.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1937

Mr. Howard F. Bishop, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

For opinions below, see 198 N.E. 451; 199 N.E. 889.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937 (28 U. S.C.A. 344(a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c), Judicial Code, as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938 (28 U.S.C.A. 344(c), certiorari is denied.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //