Skip to content


Fowler Vs. Seymour - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number304 U.S. 580
AppellantFowler
RespondentSeymour
Excerpt:
.....to the united states circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit is denied. * rehearing denied 59 s.ct. 60, 83 l.ed. --. .....
Judgment:
FOWLER v. SEYMOUR - 304 U.S. 580 (1938)
U.S. Supreme Court FOWLER v. SEYMOUR, 304 U.S. 580 (1938)

304 U.S. 580

A. K. FOWLER, Administrator, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
Russell B. SEYMOUR, Trustee, etc.*
No. 1049.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. Franklin P. Bull and Homer C. Compton, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. Calvin S. Mauk, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioners.

Mr. Thomas S. Tobin, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. Raphael Dechter, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.

For opinion below, see In re McIntosh, 95 F.2d 627.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is denied.

* Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 60, 83 L.Ed. --.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //