Skip to content


Labor Board Vs. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number315 U.S. 282
AppellantLabor Board
RespondentAutomotive Maintenance Mach. Co.
Excerpt:
.....labor board v. automotive maintenance mach. co. - 315 u.s. 282 (1942) u.s. supreme court labor board v. automotive maintenance mach. co., 315 u.s. 282 (1942) labor board v. automotive maintenance machinery co. no. 188 argued february 3, 1942 decided february 16, 1942 315 u.s. 282 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit findings of the labor board sustained as supported by substantial evidence. p. 315 u. s. 282 . 116 f.2d 350 reversed. certiorari, 314 u.s. 596, to review a judgment setting aside an order of the national labor relations board, 13 n.l.r.b. 338, ordering the company to cease and desist from unfair labor practices; to cease giving effect to a contract with an "inside".....
Judgment:
Labor Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co. - 315 U.S. 282 (1942)
U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co., 315 U.S. 282 (1942)

Labor Board v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co.

No. 188

Argued February 3, 1942

Decided February 16, 1942

315 U.S. 282

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Findings of the Labor Board sustained as supported by substantial evidence. P. 315 U. S. 282 .

116 F.2d 350 reversed.

Certiorari, 314 U.S. 596, to review a judgment setting aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, 13 N.L.R.B. 338, ordering the company to cease and desist from unfair labor practices; to cease giving effect to a contract with an "inside" union; to withdraw recognition from, and to disestablish, that union; to reinstate with backpay three discharged employees, and to post notices, etc. A provision of the order for reimbursement of certain Government relief agencies was abandoned by the Board.

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584 ; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U.S. 660. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board's order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S.

Page 315 U. S. 283

7. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.

Reversed, with directions.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //