Skip to content


Jones Vs. Opelika - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number319 U.S. 103
AppellantJones
RespondentOpelika
Excerpt:
.....heretofore entered in these cases, 316 u. s. 316 u.s. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. p. 319 u. s. 104 . 242 ala. 549, 7 so.2d 503, reversed. 202 ark. 614, 151 s.w.2d 1000, reversed. 58 ariz. 144, 118 p.2d 97, reversed. page 319 u. s. 104 per curiam (announced by mr. justice douglas). the judgments in these cases were affirmed at the october term, 1941. 316 u. s. 316 u.s. 584. because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with murdock v. pennsylvania, post, p. 319 u. s. 105 ......
Judgment:
Jones v. Opelika - 319 U.S. 103 (1943)
U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Jones v. Opelika

No. 280, October Term, 1941

Reargued March 10, 11, 1943

Decided May 3, 1943

319 U.S. 103

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Syllabus

Upon rehearing, 318 U.S. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. P. 319 U. S. 104 .

242 Ala. 549, 7 So.2d 503, reversed.

202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, reversed.

58 Ariz. 144, 118 P.2d 97, reversed.

Page 319 U. S. 104

PER CURIAM (announced by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS).

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 319 U. S. 105 . For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.

So ordered.

For dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, see post, pp. 319 U. S. 117 -140.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //