Skip to content

Warehime Vs. H.H. Varney - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number325 U.S. 882
RespondentH.H. Varney
warehime v. h.h. varney - 325 u.s. 882 (1945) u.s. supreme court warehime v. h.h. varney, 325 u.s. 882 (1945) 325 u.s. 882 william a. warehime, d. b. a nezen milk food company, et al., petitioners, v. h. h. varney, milk market agent, war food administration, et al. no. 1296. supreme court of the united states june 18, 1945 rehearing denied oct. 8, 1945. see 66 s.ct. 15. mr. paul w. walter, for petitioners. assistant solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general tom c. clark, mr. robert s. erdahl and miss beatrice rosenberg, for respondents. petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the sixth circuit. denied.
WAREHIME v. H.H. VARNEY - 325 U.S. 882 (1945)
U.S. Supreme Court WAREHIME v. H.H. VARNEY, 325 U.S. 882 (1945)

325 U.S. 882

William A. WAREHIME, d. b. a Nezen Milk Food Company, et al., petitioners,
H. H. VARNEY, Milk Market Agent, War Food Administration, et al.
No. 1296.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 18, 1945

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1945.

See 66 S.Ct. 15.

Mr. Paul W. Walter, for petitioners.

Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg, for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //