Skip to content


In Re Disbarment of Isserman - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number348 U.S. 1
AppellantIn Re Disbarment of Isserman
Excerpt:
..... 348 u.s. 1 on petition for rehearing syllabus since a majority of the justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by rule 8 of the present rules of this court, the order of disbarment, 345 u. s. 286 , is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged. per curiam. april 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring isserman from the practice of law in this court pursuant to rule 2, par. 5, of this court's rules then in effect. see in re isserman, 345 u. s. 286 . the order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. rule 8 of our present rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." the petition for.....
Judgment:
In re Disbarment of Isserman - 348 U.S. 1 (1954)
U.S. Supreme Court In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (1954)

In re Disbarment of Isserman

No. 5, Misc.

October Term, 1952

Decided October 14, 1954

348 U.S. 1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Syllabus

Since a majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by Rule 8 of the present Rules of this Court, the order of disbarment, 345 U. S. 286 , is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged.

PER CURIAM.

April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this Court's Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286 . The order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." The petition for rehearing is granted. A majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set aside, and the rule against Isserman to show cause is discharged.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON, with whom MR. JUSTICE REED and MR. JUSTICE MINTON join, dissents for the reasons

Page 348 U. S. 2

stated in the opinion announced by Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, April 6, 1953, in In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286 .

MR. JUSTICE REED also calls attention to his dissent in Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 347 U. S. 388 , 347 U. S. 390 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //