Skip to content


Nelson Vs. Tennessee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 271
AppellantNelson
RespondentTennessee
Excerpt:
.....12, 1957. decided december 16, 1957. certiorari dismissed for want of properly presented federal question. reported below: 200 tenn. 462, 292 s. w. 2d 727. hobart f. atkins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. james m. glasgow, assistant attorney general of tennessee, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was george f. mccanless, attorney general. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. macdonald v. la salle national bank, conservator, 355 u.s. 271 (1957) 355 u.s. 271 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court macdonald v. la salle national bank, conservator, 355 u.s. 271 (1957) 355 u.s. 271 macdonald v. la salle national bank,.....
Judgment:
NELSON v. TENNESSEE - 355 U.S. 271 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court NELSON v. TENNESSEE, 355 U.S. 271 (1957) 355 U.S. 271

NELSON ET AL. v. TENNESSEE.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DISTRICT.
No. 56.
Argued December 12, 1957.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Certiorari dismissed for want of properly presented federal question.

Reported below: 200 Tenn. 462, 292 S. W. 2d 727.

Hobart F. Atkins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.

James M. Glasgow, Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. McCanless, Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


MACDONALD v. LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, CONSERVATOR, <a href="/99140"> 355 U.S. 271 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 271 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court MACDONALD v. LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, CONSERVATOR, 355 U.S. 271 (1957) 355 U.S. 271

MACDONALD v. LA SALLE NATIONAL BANK, CONSERVATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 504.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Ill. 2d 122, 142 N. E. 2d 58.

Appellant pro se.

John R. Nicholson and Charles M. Nisen for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 271, 272




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //