Skip to content


Rosengard Vs. City of Boston - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 272
AppellantRosengard
RespondentCity of Boston
Excerpt:
rosengard v. city of boston - 355 u.s. 272 (1957) u.s. supreme court rosengard v. city of boston, 355 u.s. 272 (1957) 355 u.s. 272 rosengard et al. v. city of boston et al. appeal from the supreme judicial court of massachusetts. no. 566. decided december 16, 1957. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 336 mass. 224, 143 n. e. 2d 683. samuel p. sears for appellants. j. edward keefe, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 355 u.s. 272, 273
Judgment:
ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON - 355 U.S. 272 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSENGARD v. CITY OF BOSTON, 355 U.S. 272 (1957) 355 U.S. 272

ROSENGARD ET AL. v. CITY OF BOSTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 566.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 336 Mass. 224, 143 N. E. 2d 683.

Samuel P. Sears for appellants.

J. Edward Keefe, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 272, 273




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //