Skip to content


Cano Vs. Pennsylvania - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 182
AppellantCano
RespondentPennsylvania
Excerpt:
.....supreme court of pennsylvania, eastern district. no. 538. decided december 9, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 389 pa. 639, 133 a. 2d 800. william t. coleman, jr. for appellants. thomas d. mcbride, attorney general of pennsylvania, and leon ehrlich, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. keco industries v. cincinnati & suburban bell tel. co., 355 u.s. 182 (1957) 355 u.s. 182 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court keco industries v. cincinnati & suburban bell tel. co., 355 u.s. 182 (1957) 355 u.s. 182 keco industries, inc., et al. v......
Judgment:
CANO v. PENNSYLVANIA - 355 U.S. 182 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court CANO v. PENNSYLVANIA, 355 U.S. 182 (1957) 355 U.S. 182

CANO ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.
No. 538.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 389 Pa. 639, 133 A. 2d 800.

William T. Coleman, Jr. for appellants.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Leon Ehrlich, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KECO INDUSTRIES v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TEL. CO., <a href="/99155"> 355 U.S. 182 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 182 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court KECO INDUSTRIES v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TEL. CO., 355 U.S. 182 (1957) 355 U.S. 182

KECO INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TELEPHONE CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 543.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 166 Ohio St. 254, 141 N. E. 2d 465.

Joseph A. Segal for appellants.

Carl M. Jacobs, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 182, 183




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //