Skip to content


Hobart Vs. Hobart - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 21
AppellantHobart
RespondentHobart
Excerpt:
hobart v. hobart - 355 u.s. 21 (1957) u.s. supreme court hobart v. hobart, 355 u.s. 21 (1957) 355 u.s. 21 hobart v. hobart. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 355. decided october 21, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 166 ohio st. 112, 141 n. e. 2d 470. baird broomhall, william m. harrelson and richard wilson for appellant. c. v. diedel and frank e. bazler for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 355 u.s. 21, 22
Judgment:
HOBART v. HOBART - 355 U.S. 21 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court HOBART v. HOBART, 355 U.S. 21 (1957) 355 U.S. 21

HOBART v. HOBART.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 355.
Decided October 21, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 166 Ohio St. 112, 141 N. E. 2d 470.

Baird Broomhall, William M. Harrelson and Richard Wilson for appellant.

C. V. Diedel and Frank E. Bazler for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 21, 22




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //