Skip to content


Nationwide Trailer Rental System Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 10
AppellantNationwide Trailer Rental System
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
nationwide trailer rental system v. united states - 355 u.s. 10 (1957) u.s. supreme court nationwide trailer rental system v. united states, 355 u.s. 10 (1957) 355 u.s. 10 nationwide trailer rental system, inc., et al. v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the district of kansas. no. 114. decided october 14, 1957. judgment affirmed. thurman arnold, reed miller and william t. stephens for appellants. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen and charles h. weston for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. white v. washington., 355 u.s. 10 (1957) 355 u.s. 10 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court white v......
Judgment:
NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES - 355 U.S. 10 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 10 (1957) 355 U.S. 10

NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 114.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Judgment affirmed.

Thurman Arnold, Reed Miller and William T. Stephens for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


WHITE v. WASHINGTON., <a href="/99192"> 355 U.S. 10 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 10 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court WHITE v. WASHINGTON., 355 U.S. 10 (1957) 355 U.S. 10

WHITE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS KITSAP AUTOMATIC DISPENSER CO., ET AL.
v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 184.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 49 Wash. 2d 716, 306 P.2d 230.

S. Harold Shefelman for appellants.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Keith Grim and Fred C. Dorsey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 10, 11




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //