Skip to content


Lincoln Building Associates Vs. Barr - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 12
AppellantLincoln Building Associates
RespondentBarr
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 128. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 1 n. y. 2d 413, 135 n. e. 2d 801. max freund for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. cottrell v. pawcatuck company, 355 u.s. 12 (1957) 355 u.s. 12 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court cottrell v. pawcatuck company, 355 u.s. 12 (1957) 355 u.s. 12 cottrell v. pawcatuck company (formerly c. b. cottrell & sons co.) et al. appeal from the supreme court of delaware. no. 316. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: ___ del. ___, 128 a. 2d 225. .....
Judgment:
LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR - 355 U.S. 12 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR, 355 U.S. 12 (1957) 355 U.S. 12

LINCOLN BUILDING ASSOCIATES v. BARR ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS SWIM FOR
HEALTH ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 1 N. Y. 2d 413, 135 N. E. 2d 801.

Max Freund for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, <a href="/99194"> 355 U.S. 12 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 12 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY, 355 U.S. 12 (1957) 355 U.S. 12

COTTRELL v. PAWCATUCK COMPANY (FORMERLY C. B. COTTRELL & SONS CO.) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE.
No. 316.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 128 A. 2d 225.

Edward J. Ennis for appellant.

Henry M. Canby for the Pawcatuck Company et al. and David F. Anderson for the Harris-Seybold Company et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 12, 13




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //