Skip to content


Gibraltar Factors Corp. Vs. Slapo - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 13
AppellantGibraltar Factors Corp.
RespondentSlapo
Excerpt:
.....for want of a substantial federal question. interstate commerce comm. v. premier peat moss corp., 355 u.s. 13 (1957) 355 u.s. 13 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court interstate commerce comm. v. premier peat moss corp., 355 u.s. 13 (1957) 355 u.s. 13 interstate commerce commission v. premier peat moss corp. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 148. decided october 14, 1957. * 147 f. supp. 169, affirmed. [ footnote * ] together with no. 149, baltimore & ohio railroad co. et al. v. premier peat moss corp. et al., on appeal from the same court. robert w. ginnane and b. franklin taylor, jr. for appellant in no. 148. carl helmetag, jr. for.....
Judgment:
GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO - 355 U.S. 13 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO, 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13

GIBRALTAR FACTORS CORP. v. SLAPO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 278.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 23 N. J. 459, 129 A. 2d 567.

George H. Rosenstein for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM. v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP., <a href="/99195"> 355 U.S. 13 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 13 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM. v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP., 355 U.S. 13 (1957) 355 U.S. 13

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 148.
Decided October 14, 1957. *

147 F. Supp. 169, affirmed.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 149, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Premier Peat Moss Corp. et al., on appeal from the same court.

Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for appellant in No. 148.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. for appellants in No. 149.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 355 U.S. 13, 14




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //