Skip to content


James Vs. Todd - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 206
AppellantJames
RespondentTodd
Excerpt:
james v. todd - 358 u.s. 206 (1958) u.s. supreme court james v. todd, 358 u.s. 206 (1958) 358 u.s. 206 james et al. v. todd, commissioner of agriculture and industries of alabama. appeal from the supreme court of alabama. no. 464. decided december 15, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 267 ala. 495, 103 so.2d 19. joe t. patterson, attorney general of mississippi, w. e. mcintyre, jr., special assistant attorney general, frank m. dixon and sol e. brinsfield for appellants. john patterson, attorney general of alabama, and gordon madison and george o. miller, jr., assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.....
Judgment:
JAMES v. TODD - 358 U.S. 206 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court JAMES v. TODD, 358 U.S. 206 (1958) 358 U.S. 206

JAMES ET AL. v. TODD, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRIES
OF ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. No. 464.
Decided December 15, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 267 Ala. 495, 103 So.2d 19.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, W. E. McIntyre, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, Frank M. Dixon and Sol E. Brinsfield for appellants.

John Patterson, Attorney General of Alabama, and Gordon Madison and George O. Miller, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 206, 207




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //