Skip to content


Kidd Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 132
AppellantKidd
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
.....v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 465. decided december 8, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 167 ohio st. 521, 150 n. e. 2d 413. allen brown for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. loeber v. california, 358 u.s. 132 (1958) 358 u.s. 132 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court loeber v. california, 358 u.s. 132 (1958) 358 u.s. 132 loeber v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, fourth appellate district. no. 260, misc. decided december 8, 1958. .....
Judgment:
KIDD v. OHIO - 358 U.S. 132 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court KIDD v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 132 (1958) 358 U.S. 132

KIDD ET AL. v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 465.
Decided December 8, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 521, 150 N. E. 2d 413.

Allen Brown for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


LOEBER v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/99324"> 358 U.S. 132 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 132 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court LOEBER v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 132 (1958) 358 U.S. 132

LOEBER v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 260, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 158 Cal. App. 2d 730, 323 P.2d 136.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 132, 133




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //