Skip to content


Fellom Vs. Redevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 56
AppellantFellom
RespondentRedevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco
Excerpt:
.....u.s. 56 (1958) 358 u.s. 56 fellom et al. v. redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco et al. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, first appellate district. no. 323. decided october 27, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 157 cal. app. 2d 243, 320 p.2d 884. appellants pro se. dion r. holm and george e. baglin for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 358 u.s. 56, 57
Judgment:
FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO - 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958) 358 U.S. 56

FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 323.
Decided October 27, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.

Appellants pro se.

Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 56, 57




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //