Skip to content


Kovrak Vs. Ginsburg - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 52
AppellantKovrak
RespondentGinsburg
Excerpt:
kovrak v. ginsburg - 358 u.s. 52 (1958) u.s. supreme court kovrak v. ginsburg, 358 u.s. 52 (1958) 358 u.s. 52 kovrak v. ginsburg et al., members of the committee on unauthorized practice of the law. appeal from the supreme court of pennsylvania, eastern district. no. 266. decided october 20, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 392 pa. 143, 139 a. 2d 889. filindo b. masino and william b. ball for appellant. robert w. lees for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 358 u.s. 52, 53
Judgment:
KOVRAK v. GINSBURG - 358 U.S. 52 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court KOVRAK v. GINSBURG, 358 U.S. 52 (1958) 358 U.S. 52

KOVRAK v. GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON
UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT. No. 266.
Decided October 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 392 Pa. 143, 139 A. 2d 889.

Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball for appellant.

Robert W. Lees for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 52, 53




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //