Skip to content


Boston Five Cents Savings Bank Vs. City of New Bedford - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 53
AppellantBoston Five Cents Savings Bank
RespondentCity of New Bedford
Excerpt:
.....superior court of massachusetts, bristol county. no. 273. decided october 20, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: see 336 mass. 651, 148 n. e. 2d 637. robert g. dodge and harold s. davis for appellants. joseph c. duggan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. graham-white sales corp. v. prime manufacturing co., 358 u.s. 53 (1958) 358 u.s. 53 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court graham-white sales corp. v. prime manufacturing co., 358 u.s. 53 (1958) 358 u.s. 53 graham-white sales corp. et al. v. prime manufacturing co. appeal from the supreme court of wisconsin. no......
Judgment:
BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD - 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, 358 U.S. 53 (1958) 358 U.S. 53

BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, BRISTOL COUNTY.
No. 273.
Decided October 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 336 Mass. 651, 148 N. E. 2d 637.

Robert G. Dodge and Harold S. Davis for appellants.

Joseph C. Duggan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO., <a href="/99345"> 358 U.S. 53 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 53 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO., 358 U.S. 53 (1958) 358 U.S. 53

GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. ET AL. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 297.
Decided October 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 3 Wis. 2d 156, 87 N. W. 2d 788.

Maxwell H. Herriott for appellants.

John W. Michael and Herman E. Friedrich for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 53, 54




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //