Skip to content


Steinbeck Vs. Gerosa - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 39
AppellantSteinbeck
RespondentGerosa
Excerpt:
steinbeck v. gerosa - 358 u.s. 39 (1958) u.s. supreme court steinbeck v. gerosa, 358 u.s. 39 (1958) 358 u.s. 39 steinbeck v. gerosa, comptroller of new york city, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 294. decided october 13, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 4 n. y. 2d 302, 151 n. e. 2d 170. irwin karp for appellant. peter campbell brown and stanley buchsbaum for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 358 u.s. 39, 40
Judgment:
STEINBECK v. GEROSA - 358 U.S. 39 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court STEINBECK v. GEROSA, 358 U.S. 39 (1958) 358 U.S. 39

STEINBECK v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 294.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 302, 151 N. E. 2d 170.

Irwin Karp for appellant.

Peter Campbell Brown and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 358 U.S. 39, 40




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //