Skip to content


Linder Vs. Collins - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 44
AppellantLinder
RespondentCollins
Excerpt:
linder v. collins - 358 u.s. 44 (1958) u.s. supreme court linder v. collins, 358 u.s. 44 (1958) 358 u.s. 44 linder v. collins et al., members of the board of county commissioners of wallace county, kansas, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of kansas. no. 86. decided october 13, 1958. affirmed. jesse i. linder, john j. yowell and g. kent yowell for appellant. james e. taylor and verne m. laing for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. pennsylvania railroad co. v. borough of sayreville, 358 u.s. 44 (1958) 358 u.s. 44 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court pennsylvania railroad co. v. borough of sayreville, 358 u.s. 44 .....
Judgment:
LINDER v. COLLINS - 358 U.S. 44 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court LINDER v. COLLINS, 358 U.S. 44 (1958) 358 U.S. 44

LINDER v. COLLINS ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF WALLACE COUNTY, KANSAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 86.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Affirmed.

Jesse I. Linder, John J. Yowell and G. Kent Yowell for appellant.

James E. Taylor and Verne M. Laing for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE, <a href="/99356"> 358 U.S. 44 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 44 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE, 358 U.S. 44 (1958) 358 U.S. 44

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 179.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 26 N. J. 197, 139 A. 2d 97.

Windsor F. Cousins and Hugh B. Cox for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, Joseph T. Karcher and Samuel V. Convery for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 44, 45




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //