Skip to content


Grochowiak Vs. Pennsylvania - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 47
AppellantGrochowiak
RespondentPennsylvania
Excerpt:
.....court of pennsylvania, philadelphia district. no. 166. decided october 13, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 184 pa. super. 522, 136 a. 2d 145. john w. keller and mitchell salem fisher for appellant. thomas d. mcbride, attorney general of pennsylvania, frank p. lawley, jr. and harry j. rubin, deputy attorneys general, and george c. eppinger for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. maranze v. montgomery county board of elections, 358 u.s. 47 (1958) 358 u.s. 47 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court maranze.....
Judgment:
GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA - 358 U.S. 47 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 358 U.S. 47 (1958) 358 U.S. 47

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT.
No. 166.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 184 Pa. Super. 522, 136 A. 2d 145.

John W. Keller and Mitchell Salem Fisher for appellant.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Frank P. Lawley, Jr. and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, and George C. Eppinger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, <a href="/99359"> 358 U.S. 47 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 47 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 358 U.S. 47 (1958) 358 U.S. 47

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 323, 148 N. E. 2d 229.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 47, 48




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //