Skip to content


First Methodist Church of San Leandro Vs. Horstmann - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number357 U.S. 568
AppellantFirst Methodist Church of San Leandro
RespondentHorstmann
Excerpt:
.....no. 485. decided june 30, 1958. 48 cal. 2d 901, 311 p.2d 542, reversed on the authority of cases cited. stanley a. weigel, lawrence speiser and frank b. frederick for appellants. j. f. coakley for appellees, and arthur m. carden for the city of san leandro, appellee. per curiam. the judgment is reversed. no. 382, first unitarian church of los angeles v. county of los angeles, ante, p. 545; no. 385, valley unitarian-universalist church, inc., v. county of los angeles, ante, p. 545; no. 483, speiser v. randall, ante, p. 513, and no. 484, prince v. city and county of san francisco, ante, p. 513, decided this day. mr. justice clark dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in nos. 382 and 385, and nos. 483 and 484, decided this day. .....
Judgment:
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF SAN LEANDRO v. HORSTMANN - 357 U.S. 568 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF SAN LEANDRO v. HORSTMANN, 357 U.S. 568 (1958) 357 U.S. 568

FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF SAN LEANDRO ET AL. v. HORSTMANN, ASSESSOR OF
ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 485.
Decided June 30, 1958.

48 Cal. 2d 901, 311 P.2d 542, reversed on the authority of cases cited.

Stanley A. Weigel, Lawrence Speiser and Frank B. Frederick for appellants.

J. F. Coakley for appellees, and Arthur M. Carden for the City of San Leandro, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. No. 382, First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 545; No. 385, Valley Unitarian-Universalist Church, Inc., v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 545; No. 483, Speiser v. Randall, ante, p. 513, and No. 484, Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, ante, p. 513, decided this day.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in Nos. 382 and 385, and Nos. 483 and 484, decided this day.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 357 U.S. 568, 569




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //