Skip to content


AmlIn Vs. Verbeem - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 676
AppellantAmlin
RespondentVerbeem
Excerpt:
amlin v. verbeem - 356 u.s. 676 (1958) u.s. supreme court amlin v. verbeem, 356 u.s. 676 (1958) 356 u.s. 676 amlin et al., doing business as amlin cartage, et al. v. verbeem, doing business as peters cartage, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan. no. 881. decided may 26, 1958. 154 f. supp. 431, affirmed. george h. cholack for appellants. wilhelmina boersma and wilber m. brucker, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 356 u.s. 676, 677
Judgment:
AMLIN v. VERBEEM - 356 U.S. 676 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court AMLIN v. VERBEEM, 356 U.S. 676 (1958) 356 U.S. 676

AMLIN ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS AMLIN CARTAGE, ET AL. v. VERBEEM, DOING
BUSINESS AS PETERS CARTAGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 881.
Decided May 26, 1958.

154 F. Supp. 431, affirmed.

George H. Cholack for appellants.

Wilhelmina Boersma and Wilber M. Brucker, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 676, 677




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //