Skip to content


Babcock Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 581
AppellantBabcock
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. north western-hanna fuel co. v. united states, 356 u.s. 581 (1958) 356 u.s. 581 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court north western-hanna fuel co. v. united states, 356 u.s. 581 (1958) 356 u.s. 581 north western-hanna fuel co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of minnesota. no. 861. decided may 19, 1958. 161 f. supp. 714, affirmed. john f. donelan and lee loevinger for appellants. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, charles h. weston, robert w. ginnane and charlie h. johns for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. curtis.....
Judgment:
BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA - 356 U.S. 581 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA, 356 U.S. 581 (1958) 356 U.S. 581

BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. No. 853.
Decided May 19, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Austin Clapp for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/99446"> 356 U.S. 581 </a> (1958) 356 U.S. 581 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 581 (1958) 356 U.S. 581

NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 861.
Decided May 19, 1958.

161 F. Supp. 714, affirmed.

John F. Donelan and Lee Loevinger for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Curtis H. Berg for the Canadian National Railway Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 581, 582




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //