Skip to content


Ratner Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 368
AppellantRatner
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
ratner v. united states - 356 u.s. 368 (1958) u.s. supreme court ratner v. united states, 356 u.s. 368 (1958) 356 u.s. 368 ratner v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of illinois. no. 819. decided may 5, 1958. 162 f. supp. 518, affirmed. david axelrod and james l. givan for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, charles h. weston and robert w. ginnane for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, and walter harwood for the hoover motor express co., inc., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 356 u.s. 368, 369
Judgment:
RATNER v. UNITED STATES - 356 U.S. 368 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court RATNER v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 368 (1958) 356 U.S. 368

RATNER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 819.
Decided May 5, 1958.

162 F. Supp. 518, affirmed.

David Axelrod and James L. Givan for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Walter Harwood for the Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 368, 369




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //