Skip to content


United States Vs. Diamond - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 257
AppellantUnited States
RespondentDiamond
Excerpt:
united states v. diamond - 356 u.s. 257 (1958) u.s. supreme court united states v. diamond, 356 u.s. 257 (1958) 356 u.s. 257 united states v. diamond, alias dumanus, thornson and slater, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 771. decided april 7, 1958. certiorari granted and judgment affirmed. reported below: 255 f.2d 749 . solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general mclean, beatrice rosenberg and j. f. bishop for the united states. robert l. brock for david diamond, respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 356 u.s. 257, 258
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND - 356 U.S. 257 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, 356 U.S. 257 (1958) 356 U.S. 257

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, ALIAS DUMANUS, THORNSON AND SLATER, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 771.
Decided April 7, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 255 F.2d 749 .

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Robert L. Brock for David Diamond, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 257, 258




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //