Skip to content


American Motors Corp. Vs. Kenosha - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 21
AppellantAmerican Motors Corp.
RespondentKenosha
Excerpt:
american motors corp. v. kenosha - 356 u.s. 21 (1958) u.s. supreme court american motors corp. v. kenosha, 356 u.s. 21 (1958) 356 u.s. 21 american motors corp. et al. v. city of kenosha. appeal from the supreme court of wisconsin. no. 343. decided march 10, 1958. 274 wis. 315, 80 n. w. 2d 363, affirmed. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general rice, john n. stull, a. f. prescott and h. eugene heine, jr. for the united states, and alfred e. lafrance for the american motors corporation, appellants. wm. j. p. abert and robert v. baker for appellee. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice frankfurter, mr. justice burton, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice whittaker.....
Judgment:
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA - 356 U.S. 21 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. v. KENOSHA, 356 U.S. 21 (1958) 356 U.S. 21

AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. ET AL. v. CITY OF KENOSHA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 343.
Decided March 10, 1958.

274 Wis. 315, 80 N. W. 2d 363, affirmed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants.

Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495 , 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.

Page 356 U.S. 21, 22




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //