Skip to content


Zivnostenska Banka Vs. Stephen - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 22
AppellantZivnostenska Banka
RespondentStephen
Excerpt:
zivnostenska banka v. stephen - 356 u.s. 22 (1958) u.s. supreme court zivnostenska banka v. stephen, 356 u.s. 22 (1958) 356 u.s. 22 zivnostenska banka, national corporation, v. stephen, formerly known as augstein, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 717. decided march 10, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 3 n. y. 2d 862, 145 n. e. 2d 24. lemuel skidmore for appellant. sigmund timberg for appellees. per curiam. the motion for leave to file brief of frank petschek et al., as amici curiae, is granted. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 356 u.s. 22, 23
Judgment:
ZIVNOSTENSKA BANKA v. STEPHEN - 356 U.S. 22 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court ZIVNOSTENSKA BANKA v. STEPHEN, 356 U.S. 22 (1958) 356 U.S. 22

ZIVNOSTENSKA BANKA, NATIONAL CORPORATION, v. STEPHEN, FORMERLY KNOWN
AS AUGSTEIN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 717.
Decided March 10, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 3 N. Y. 2d 862, 145 N. E. 2d 24.

Lemuel Skidmore for appellant.

Sigmund Timberg for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file brief of Frank Petschek et al., as amici curiae, is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 356 U.S. 22, 23




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //