Skip to content


Houston Railway Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 23
AppellantHouston Railway Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
houston railway co. v. united states - 356 u.s. 23 (1958) u.s. supreme court houston railway co. v. united states, 356 u.s. 23 (1958) 356 u.s. 23 houston belt & terminal railway co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of texas. no. 730. decided march 10, 1958. 153 f. supp. 3, affirmed. r. s. outlaw, t. r. ware, g. w. holmes and c. m. spence for appellants. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, henry geller, robert w. ginnane and b. franklin taylor, jr. for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, and c. brien dillon for the texas & new orleans railroad co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted.....
Judgment:
HOUSTON RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES - 356 U.S. 23 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court HOUSTON RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 23 (1958) 356 U.S. 23

HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 730.
Decided March 10, 1958.

153 F. Supp. 3, affirmed.

R. S. Outlaw, T. R. Ware, G. W. Holmes and C. M. Spence for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Henry Geller, Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and C. Brien Dillon for the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 23, 24




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //