Skip to content


Howard Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number356 U.S. 25
AppellantHoward
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
howard v. united states - 356 u.s. 25 (1958) u.s. supreme court howard v. united states, 356 u.s. 25 (1958) 356 u.s. 25 howard v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 186, misc. decided march 10, 1958. on representations of the solicitor general and examination of the record, certiorari granted, judgment of court of appeals vacated, and case remanded to district court with directions to afford petitioner a hearing on his motion under 28 u.s.c. 2255. reported below: 101 u.s. app. d.c. 131, 247 f.2d 537 . petitioner pro se. solicitor general rankin, warren olney, iii, then assistant attorney general, beatrice rosenberg and julia p. cooper.....
Judgment:
HOWARD v. UNITED STATES - 356 U.S. 25 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court HOWARD v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 25 (1958) 356 U.S. 25

HOWARD v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 186, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1958.

On representations of the Solicitor General and examination of the record, certiorari granted, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated, and case remanded to District Court with directions to afford petitioner a hearing on his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255.

Reported below: 101 U.S. App. D.C. 131, 247 F.2d 537 .

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Upon the representations made in the Solicitor General's memorandum, and an examination of the record, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to afford petitioner a hearing on his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255.

Page 356 U.S. 25, 26




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //