Skip to content


Texas Ex Rel. Pan Amer. Prod. Vs. City of Texas City - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 603
AppellantTexas Ex Rel. Pan Amer. Prod.
RespondentCity of Texas City
Excerpt:
texas ex rel. pan amer. prod. v. city of texas city - 355 u.s. 603 (1958) u.s. supreme court texas ex rel. pan amer. prod. v. city of texas city, 355 u.s. 603 (1958) 355 u.s. 603 texas ex rel. pan american production co. et al. v. city of texas city, texas, et al. appeal from the supreme court of texas. no. 574. decided march 3, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 157 tex. ___, 303 s. w. 2d 780. francis g. coates for appellants. dow h. heard for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. oosterhoudt v. morgan, 355 u.s. 603 (1958) 355 u.s. 603 (1958) "> u.s. supreme.....
Judgment:
TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY - 355 U.S. 603 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY, 355 U.S. 603 (1958) 355 U.S. 603

TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY,
TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. No. 574.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.

Francis G. Coates for appellants.

Dow H. Heard for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, <a href="/99506"> 355 U.S. 603 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 603 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958) 355 U.S. 603

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.

Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.

Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 603, 604




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //