Skip to content


Mills Mill Vs. Hawkins - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 605
AppellantMills Mill
RespondentHawkins
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 670. decided march 3, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: ___ s. c. ___. l. w. perrin, jr., edward p. perrin and j. davis kerr for appellants. harvey w. johnson for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. klig v. rogers, 355 u.s. 605 (1958) 355 u.s. 605 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court klig v. rogers, 355 u.s. 605 (1958) 355 u.s. 605 klig v. rogers, attorney general. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 143. decided march 3, 1958. upon suggestion of.....
Judgment:
MILLS MILL v. HAWKINS - 355 U.S. 605 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court MILLS MILL v. HAWKINS, 355 U.S. 605 (1958) 355 U.S. 605

MILLS MILL ET AL. v. HAWKINS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE UNA WATER DISTRICT
COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 670.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ S. C. ___.

L. W. Perrin, Jr., Edward P. Perrin and J. Davis Kerr for appellants.

Harvey W. Johnson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


KLIG v. ROGERS, <a href="/99508"> 355 U.S. 605 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 605 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court KLIG v. ROGERS, 355 U.S. 605 (1958) 355 U.S. 605

KLIG v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 143.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss.

Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 294, 244 F.2d 742 .

Jack Wasserman and David Carliner for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon suggestion of mootness by all of the parties, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

Page 355 U.S. 605, 606




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //