Skip to content


Strauss Vs. University of the State of New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 394
AppellantStrauss
RespondentUniversity of the State of New York
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 610. decided january 20, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 2 n. y. 2d 464, 141 n. e. 2d 595. alan y. cole for appellants. charles a. brind, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. taylor v. kentucky, 355 u.s. 394 (1958) 355 u.s. 394 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court taylor v. kentucky, 355 u.s. 394 (1958) 355 u.s. 394 taylor et al. v. kentucky. appeal from the court of appeals of kentucky. no. 611. decided january 20, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported.....
Judgment:
STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - 355 U.S. 394 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

STRAUSS ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 610.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N. Y. 2d 464, 141 N. E. 2d 595.

Alan Y. Cole for appellants.

Charles A. Brind, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, <a href="/99524"> 355 U.S. 394 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 394 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

TAYLOR ET AL. v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 611.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 302 S. W. 2d 583.

Alexander H. Sands, Littleton M. Wickham and H. V. Forsyth for appellants.

Jo M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kentucky, and William F. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 394, 395




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //