Skip to content


Southern Railway Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 370
AppellantSouthern Railway Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
southern railway co. v. united states - 355 u.s. 370 (1958) u.s. supreme court southern railway co. v. united states, 355 u.s. 370 (1958) 355 u.s. 370 southern railway co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of virginia. no. 579. decided january 13, 1958. 154 f. supp. 562, affirmed. henry l. walker, arthur j. dixon, james a. bistline and r. granville curry for appellants. john w. adams, jr., charles p. reynolds, r. b. claytor, martin a. meyer, jr. and walter c. scott, jr. for the atlanta & st. andrews bay railway co. et al., and john s. burchmore and robert n. burchmore for cramet inc., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment.....
Judgment:
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES - 355 U.S. 370 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 370 (1958) 355 U.S. 370

SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 579.
Decided January 13, 1958.

154 F. Supp. 562, affirmed.

Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants.

John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Claytor, Martin A. Meyer, Jr. and Walter C. Scott, Jr. for the Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. et al., and John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for Cramet Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 355 U.S. 370, 371




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //