Skip to content


Bartkus Vs. Illinois - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number355 U.S. 281
AppellantBartkus
Respondentillinois
Excerpt:
.....the supreme court of illinois. no. 39. argued november 19, 1957. decided january 6, 1958. 7 ill. 2d 138, 130 n. e. 2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided court. walter t. fisher, acting under appointment by the court, 352 u.s. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. william c. wines, assistant attorney general of illinois, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were latham castle, attorney general, and theodore g. maheras, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 355 u.s. 281, 282
Judgment:
BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS - 355 U.S. 281 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 281 (1958) 355 U.S. 281

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 39.
Argued November 19, 1957.
Decided January 6, 1958.

7 Ill. 2d 138, 130 N. E. 2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U.S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Latham Castle, Attorney General, and Theodore G. Maheras, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 355 U.S. 281, 282




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //