Skip to content


J. Aron and Co. Vs. Mississippi Shipping Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 115
AppellantJ. Aron and Co.
RespondentMississippi Shipping Co.
Excerpt:
.....115 j. aron & company, inc., v. mississippi shipping company, inc. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 450. decided november 23, 1959. consent judgment having been entered by the district court since judgment of reversal by court of appeals, certiorari granted, judgment of the court of appeals vacated and case remanded. reported below: 270 f.2d 345 . eberhard p. deutsch, brunswick g. deutsch and rene h. himel, jr. for petitioner. per curiam. * it appearing from the petitioner's suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the court of appeals of the original interlocutory decree of the district court and the filing of the petition for writ.....
Judgment:
J. ARON & CO. v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING CO. - 361 U.S. 115 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court J. ARON & CO. v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING CO., 361 U.S. 115 (1959) 361 U.S. 115

J. ARON & COMPANY, INC., v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING COMPANY, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 450.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Consent judgment having been entered by the District Court since judgment of reversal by Court of Appeals, certiorari granted, judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 270 F.2d 345 .

Eberhard P. Deutsch, Brunswick G. Deutsch and Rene H. Himel, Jr. for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

*

It appearing from the petitioner's suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the original interlocutory decree of the District Court and the filing of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment for damages and costs was entered by the District Court, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

[ Footnote * ] [REPORTER'S NOTE: This decision per curiam is reported as amended by an order entered December 14, 1959.]

Page 361 U.S. 115, 116




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //